GrowingThe database is where software systems commit to a version of reality. Every table, column, and constraint is a decision about what matters, what doesn’t, and what is allowed to exist. Treating the database as an implementation detail is one of the most expensive mistakes teams make.
A well-designed database doesn’t just store data; it protects it. Constraints, foreign keys, and sensible normalization are not academic concerns. They are safeguards against bugs, edge cases, and human error. Application code changes frequently. Data lives much longer.
ORMs are useful tools, but they can obscure what the database is actually doing. When developers stop thinking in terms of queries, indexes, and execution plans, performance issues become mysterious instead of obvious. Understanding the database is not optional for backend engineers. It’s foundational.
Schema design deserves more respect than it usually gets. A poor schema forces compensating logic everywhere else: in queries, services, caches, and reports. A good schema simplifies everything downstream. It reduces the need for validation, duplication, and defensive coding.
One lesson that keeps repeating itself: data shapes behavior. If a schema allows invalid states, those states will eventually appear. If relationships are ambiguous, interpretations will diverge. The database should make invalid data hard, or even impossible, to store.
Migrations are another overlooked aspect of database work. They are not just mechanical changes; they are moments where assumptions are tested against reality. Backward compatibility, data volume, and locking behavior all matter. Treating migrations casually is how outages are born.
Ultimately, the database is not just part of the system. It is the system’s memory. If it’s inconsistent, everything built on top of it will be too. Investing time in good data modeling pays dividends for years, often long after individual services or frameworks have been replaced.
Twitter